|
|
| |
|
| CASE STUDY |
|
| VPN SOLUTIONS |
|
| SECURITY VPN SOLUTIONS |
| CHEESE COMPANY |
|
| |
|
| The Challenge |
|
|
A leading Hispanic cheese manufacturing company in the
United States approached Future Computing Solutions, Inc. (FCSI) to connect
physically remote employees to the Corporate Local Area Network in a secure
fashion, commonly referred to as Remote Access VPN. Prior to a VPN install,
traveling users were dialing into a modem bank in the main office, incurring
long distance expenses. The fixed location-based users were mostly using
local ISPs, with 56K dialups and cable modems, making them prime candidates
for a VPN to allow more access to the network. The home users would gain
access to the central office at higher speeds.
|
 |
| |
|
| The Solution |
|
|
Once the client identified the people they needed to
serve with a VPN, FCSI looked closely at their existing network environment.
Every hardware and software VPN solution, no matter the protocol, is designed
to package and tunnel TCP/IP packets. FCSI recently added a Cisco Pix
firewall, which offered a solution as part of their Pix software bundle.
The management decision to become a Cisco solutions provider running Windows
NT servers narrowed the field of products to two possible configurations.
If the client chose a solution based on our server types, Microsoft VPN
software would be the choice. From the router/firewall perspective, the
Cisco router between the Internet and the corporate network is an older
model. The Microsoft VPN software was installed in a client/server model,
with a Windows NT 4.0 domain controller using PPTP.
|
 |
| |
|
| The Result |
|
|
The connectivity issues raised numerous and the answers
were not easy. The amount and source of bandwidth into the company was
a huge discussion topic in their VPN research. The Cisco Pix firewall
VPN was a functional and budgetary fit. They have experienced Cisco-trained
technicians in-house and they trust it will work well in their network
environment. The performance of the Pix was also acceptable on their current
bandwidth, and scalable for future needs. They are still implementing
some remote users, but the existing T1 circuit will handle the load they
are putting on it for the next year to two years.
|
 |
|
|
|